Hi Ludo, On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 at 10:52, Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> wrote:
> That’s not true. In some cases, people write something that’s actually > code (in YAML, in JSON, etc.) and there’s an interpreter running it. > There’s usually no tooling coming with that interpreter, in particular > no debugger, error reporting may not be optimal either, and the > semantics may be ill-defined (I’m getting close to Greenspun’s tenth > rule :-)). It’s just that it’s not presented that way, but that’s what > it is. Out of curiosity, do you have examples about YAML or JSON with an interpreter running it? Thank for this interesting discussion. :-) Cheers, simon
