Hi, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.courno...@gmail.com> skribis:
> Thanks for the feedback. I wonder if some are of the opinion that since > gexp->derivation is a plain function rather than a syntax having a > special form for its 2nd argument, we should leave the default > indentation rules untouched for it? Yes, that’s my take and current practice so far: special rules for special forms (macros), not for procedures. Ludo’.
