Hi, On Mon, 06 Mar 2023 at 17:56, Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> wrote: > Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.courno...@gmail.com> skribis: > >> Thanks for the feedback. I wonder if some are of the opinion that since >> gexp->derivation is a plain function rather than a syntax having a >> special form for its 2nd argument, we should leave the default >> indentation rules untouched for it? > > Yes, that’s my take and current practice so far: special rules for > special forms (macros), not for procedures.
What is the rationale? Being able to know directly at the location when it is a plain function or a special form? For what it is worth, I do not see an high difference between the both indentations. So, my opinion would to keep the current practise. Cheers, simon
