Watching my name (and surname!) there biased me a little but I don't
get very well what you meant by the sentence. The way I understood
that was that there were people in the tread saying Xlibre isn't
harmful, and I read my name there as an example of one.
Could you please clarify to me what you meant by that?
No apologies,
I was referencing what you said earlier about how the matter is in
regards to the internal dynamics of individuals who implement changes
and therefore making my case to any such individuals
