"pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" <[email protected]> writes:
> I believe your Codex actually produced its commits from applying > documemtation and not imitating commits. Or from other users’ prompts? But when I thought[1] these agents are similar to static analysis tools we know, that is because Claude Code Security is a static analysis tool refined by putting an LLM on top. When I claimed copyright violations were unlikely, I wrongly thought of plain LLMs, but they are more involved. Just clarifying my learning. As pinoaffe saw with python-chardet mislicensing [2], lack of understanding maybe leads to these license errors, mistakenly thinking that AI is same as AI and has no copyright. This was wrong for non-LLMs. Regards, Florian [1] https://codeberg.org/guix/guix/issues/6087#issuecomment-10353664 [2] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2026-03/msg00041.html
