Pjotr Prins <[email protected]> writes: > Hey, > > It is pretty clear that Guix (despite being the most advanced Linux > distro) is not ready for AI :). I think that will change in time - > particularly when more of mentioned concerns get addressed. It is not > about being right or wrong at this point, I believe. Guix has proven > to be pretty flexible over time, so I am counting on that. > > I use AI to package and build stuff -- at high speed. Stuff I was not > able to do before. Ironically current AI is great at Guix and Scheme > and Guix, being deterministic, works well with AI. So I am happy > using AI, even though I realise that it won't end upstream (and I may > end up in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purgatory). Such is life. > > I don't think all of AI is great, and we will definitely suffer from > slop in the free software community. But if it is handled by great > engineers I think it can do extremely well. > > So, my suggestion is to not divide the community at this point and work > with what we have. The focus is on craft and provenance. I get it.
So you use AI for a channel somewhere? If the community will split, could we have consensus to maintain a shared core without LLM use in shared core Guix itself? Regards, Florian
