On Fri, May 15, 2026 at 1:02 PM Simon Tournier <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Greg, > > On Fri, 15 May 2026 at 17:59, Greg Hogan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > In the linked conversation you say "Somehow, we already had this > > discussion of team membership when discussing GCD 007". > > > > Could you link to this discussion and resolution in GCD 007? > > As I wrote in the cited message [1]: > > GCD 007 proposes: “Teams are generally open for new members to > join, but current team members retain the authority over timing > and procedures when onboarding new members.”
The request was for a link to the discussion. The claim was that this had been discussed. > Please read subsection “Team membership” [2]. > > And since this GCD 007 with the title “Teams, Special Teams and > Memberships” had been under the Discussion Period for the whole 60 days, > yes, I still think it’s correct to write: "Somehow, we already had this > discussion of team membership when discussing GCD 007". > > You might disapprove the end result but this GCD proposed to clarify > “team membership”, among other things. Anyway. Yes, clarified in the abstract, but with nothing concrete. Even the thread that you replied to noted that "unfortunately guix/guix-consensus-documents#11 [GCD 007] says little about this either" [0]. Do you disagree that GCD 007 preserved the status quo? [0] https://codeberg.org/guix/guix/pulls/8358#issuecomment-14708370
