Hi Simon,
Simon Tournier <[email protected]> writes: > > And I don’t put on the table the one “disapprove”. I’ll not open the > box of interpretation if it’s legitimated or not, especially when it was > retracted later. That’s said, considering that only one is enough, how > many potentially others that had not been expressed? > Could you point me to where the disapproval has been retracted? I must have missed that. Thank you Rutherther
