I understand, but to me that is a very risky bet to hedge on, with little to no evidence. My personal experience is most things just collapse and some terrible form of it gets accepted into the mainstream. Web 1.0 had a bubble that collapsed and gave way to an internet that only deteriorated with time.
I apologize for my pessimism, but I don't really expect actually good things from capitalists who care about nothing but their profit and would happily "disrupt" anything that comes in their way of that. They don't really care about computing and its efficiencies, and if the current scenario is not a testimony to that, I'm not sure what would be. On 5 June 2026 14:52:10 GMT+05:30, Pjotr Prins <[email protected]> wrote: >On Fri, Jun 05, 2026 at 05:42:33PM +0900, Nguyễn Gia Phong via Development of >GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution. wrote: >> On 2026-06-05 at 12:24+05:30, Divya Ranjan Pattanaik wrote: >> > We have put a total of 1.4 trillion (!) [0] dollars in this >> > and only one major company is making profit out of it. >> > >> > [0]: https://isaiprofitable.com >> >> Thanks for the beautifully put response! This sentence in particular >> is hilarious, as that one profiter is nVidia, which is like >> an arm dealer in a war. While we're at it, let's also add ExxonMobil >> to the list d-; > >Yeah, it is likely to collapse and become more efficient. That is why >I am not so fussed about energy. > >Pj. > > > >-- Divya Ranjan Pattanaik Mathematics, Philosophy & Libre Software
