>mar. 23 juin 2026 at 08:54, Steve George <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > Ludo authored a blog post covering our transition to Codeberg: > > https://guix.gnu.org/en/blog/2026/one-year-with-codeberg/ > > It's a big change, I wondered how we felt about it as a group? > > - Has it worked, or not, for you as a developer? The web gui is a pain, no threads is a serious drawback and reviews a mess; this is compensated by great emacs packages, acting as frontends (emacs-fj, emacs-forgejo, emacs-agitjo), thanks a lot to its authors ! > - What's been better? AGit workflow¹ greatly alleviates the move away from an email based workflow. We should probably put the accent on it once for good². > - What could be improved? Hopefully, one day forgejo will support email reply, and more broadly, email based workflows: sending pr, replies to issues, reviews, etc. 🤞 C. [1] https://guix.gnu.org/manual/devel/en/html_node/Submitting-Patches.html [2] https://yhetil.org/guix-devel/[email protected]/ -- Cayetano Santos . gpg: CCB8 1842 F9D7 058E CD67 377A BF5C DF4D F6BF 6682 key: meta.sr.ht/~csantosb.pgp
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
