On Tue, Jun 23, 2026 at 02:40:31PM +0200, Cayetano Santos wrote: > > >mar. 23 juin 2026 at 08:54, Steve George <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Ludo authored a blog post covering our transition to Codeberg: > > > > https://guix.gnu.org/en/blog/2026/one-year-with-codeberg/ (...)
The post was covered on Lobste.rs:
https://lobste.rs/s/pifl3k/one_year_with_codeberg
> > It's a big change, I wondered how we felt about it as a group?
> >
> > - Has it worked, or not, for you as a developer?
>
> The web gui is a pain, no threads is a serious drawback and reviews a
> mess; this is compensated by great emacs packages, acting as frontends
> (emacs-fj, emacs-forgejo, emacs-agitjo), thanks a lot to its authors !
For the Non-emacs users (who?! oh me) there's
https://codeberg.org/Cyborus/forgejo-cli/
I also found this one but haven't tried it yet https://github.com/git-pkgs/forge
The lack of threading is really annoying and we see that really strongly in GCD
discussions - I find them essentially impossible to follow on the Issues.
> > - What's been better?
>
> AGit workflow¹ greatly alleviates the move away from an email based
> workflow. We should probably put the accent on it once for good².
>
> > - What could be improved?
>
> Hopefully, one day forgejo will support email reply, and more broadly,
> email based workflows: sending pr, replies to issues, reviews, etc. 🤞
(...)
I wish this would happen, but I doubt it! My perception is the overlap between
"people who love email" and "people who write Web apps" is not that high heh :-)
But, yeah 🤞
Steve / Futurile
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
