Hello, Steve George <[email protected]> skribis:
> The other one is that Issues are a lot worse than Debbugs. For users > generally Issues are great and it's a lot more accessible. But, it > doesnn't compare to a proper bug tracker, with a real database and > interaction (here I miss email) if you're handling a lot of bugs. Adding a positive note: I’m handling many bugs (occasionally implementing them) but I’ve come to prefer Codeberg issues over emails to Debbugs. To me, cross-references between issues, pull requests, and commits is the killer feature. I find the clarity of the information flow very useful. Now, as someone used to email, the interface was a bit of a loss, but I think I’m more or less back to something enjoyable with Emacs-Forgejo. I hope there are other people who find the move positive… but maybe they’re not reading email? :-) Ludo’.
