Hi, Gabriel Wicki <[email protected]> skribis:
> As mentioned earlier: /genAI/ as a term is still not defined, as are > most other essential terms in this "ruleset". > For me, this is not acceptable. Could you propose a definition for inclusion in the document? My take is that it’s clear enough what we’re talking about in this context, and in fact, nobody asked for a definition until now if I’m not mistaken, but I don’t mind adding one for clarity. >> If GCD 008 is adopted, the project commitments and contribution policy >> will end up in the manual, next to these other sections you mention. > Why does GCD008 not mention that? It says so, first for commitments: The Guix project will publicize these commitments, by referring to it in its contribution guidelines, by making it easy to find, by presenting it in blog posts, and through any other communication deemed appropriate. … then for the policy itself: The Guix project will make this policy visible to contributors: as a file in the main repository, by adding it to the “Contributing” chapter of the manual, or in any other way deemed appropriate. >> (Also, describing other people’s work as “messy” is not in line with the >> kind of interaction we want to have here, as described in the code of >> conduct.) > Sorry, I can't find the relevant passage in the CoC, could you quote it, --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- Examples of behavior that contributes to a positive environment for our community include: […] * Being respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences […] Examples of unacceptable behavior include: […] * Trolling, insulting or derogatory comments, and personal or political attacks --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- I’ll let the moderation team (aka. maintainers) assess this. Ludo’.
