On Sep 14, 2012, at 12:11 AM, "Onno Meyer" <[email protected]> wrote:
> David replied to me: >>> A good point. Reaction drives and FTL? I'm always tempted to >>> say that reactionless thrusters are "easier" than stardrives, >>> especially since VE2nd put FTL at TL10 instead of late TL9. >> >> They're both magic. Arguing over which is more likely is silly. > > In this regard, 4E is much better than 3E. The 3E rules had > 'magical technology' pegged to TLs, with the option to dump > it. 4E has the TL^ notation. > There has never been an obligation to use the super science. First editions of _space_ and_ultratech_ were clear about that. _______________________________________________ GurpsNet-L mailing list <[email protected]> http://mail.sjgames.com/mailman/listinfo/gurpsnet-l
