I almost made the switch from Outlook to Thunderbird for one main reason. The messages still open as HTML and thus are read reliably by WE. Complicated messages loaded into Outlook 2007 don't always read properly. Outlook 2007 appears to use Word for everything and the read-to-end gets tripped up by complicated table structures. Navigation in Thunderbird works as well as outlook, each having their own quirks. I missed Outlook's go-to function because it presented a standard dialog that WE handled much better than using the side panel. What brought me back to Outlook 2007 was mainly that I've come to rely on using the follow-up date to turn my inbox into my primary task tracking tool. Thunderbird lacks the organizational prowess of Outlook.
Larry From: Blake [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 4:36 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Outlook verses thunderbird Hi all. I was just wondering what program was better in terms of navigation with we? Cheers, Blake. If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original sender only. If your reply would benefit others on the list and your message is related to GW Micro, then please consider sending your message to [email protected] so the entire list will receive it. All GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo, and can be searched through and sorted using the search form at the bottom of the page. If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, send a message to [email protected] and include leave gw-info in the body of the message. If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original sender only. If your reply would benefit others on the list and your message is related to GW Micro, then please consider sending your message to [email protected] so the entire list will receive it. All GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo, and can be searched through and sorted using the search form at the bottom of the page. If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, send a message to [email protected] and include leave gw-info in the body of the message.
