"mvn gwtmaven:shell" looks good to me, or "mvn gwtmaven:hosted" is good too.
I'm very unhappy with how the codehaus programmers did this. They should have tried to work with this project and combine efforts instead of going on their own and then using the same goal. Very frustrating.... -- Arthur Kalmenson On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 12:47 PM, Charlie Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm down with renaming the "shell" goal, sure, but how about "shell" > or "runshell" or something rather than "launch"? > > mvn gwtmaven:shell > mvn gwtmaven package > mvn gwtmaven test > > etc > > ? > > On Nov 25, 10:14 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> While we're at it, then why not change the somewhat misnamed 'gwt' >> task to be 'launch' or 'hosted' or 'hosted-mode'; so we'd have: mvn >> gwtmaven:launch >> >> My motive is that we're about to force everyone to re-learn how to >> launch, we may as well clear out the entire garage of target names, >> etc. :-) >> >> -jesse >> >> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 10:06 AM, Darren Hartford >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > gwtmaven +1 (matches the project name) > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "gwt-maven" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/gwt-maven?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
