Not yet no, the issue is still open and there have been no releases. In the meantime you should be able to use the fully qualified name (as per the FAQ), it's more verbose, but it should work fine.
http://code.google.com/p/gwt-maven/wiki/M2FAQ On Dec 1, 8:16 pm, "christian.posta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Has this prefix been changed? > > On Nov 27, 7:21 am, "Arthur Kalmenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'm really fine with any prefix change, just as long as I don't have > > to launch it with the current full package name :) > > > -- > > Arthur Kalmenson > > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 3:58 PM, Charlie Collins > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I don't think anyone likes the idea of changing the prefix, but I > > > think we have to, telling everyone to do their own "pluginGroup" is > > > going to be a bigger pain than just changing the prefix, I think (if > > > we don't change we will be constantly explaining this). > > > > How about "gwtm"? Short for the name of the project "GWT-Maven". > > > > Oh, and TotSP stands for "Temple of the Screaming Penguin" (screaming- > > > penguin.com) - my blog/personal projects site that I so cleverly named > > > about 10 years ago ;). > > > > On Nov 25, 3:18 pm, "Mirko Nasato" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> I've tried to digest the idea of changing the prefix for a few hours > > >> now, but it still doesn't go down well with me. > > > >> Personally I would rather keep 'gwt' and add a pluginGroup to my > > >> settings.xml. We (in my office) already have a gwt section in > > >> settings.xml to declare a gwt.platform variable anyway. > > > >> If there really is no other option than changing the prefix, then > > >> honestly I would avoid anything with 'maven' in it. I mean: all maven > > >> plugins have 'maven' in their name, but that's not a good reason to > > >> have it in the prefix as well. > > > >> I'd rather use 'tgwt' ('t' for TotSP, whatever that means ;-) or > > >> something similarly short. > > > >> Cheers > > > >> Mirko > > > >> 2008/11/25 Arthur Kalmenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > >> > "mvn gwtmaven:shell" looks good to me, or "mvn gwtmaven:hosted" is > > >> > good too. > > > >> > I'm very unhappy with how the codehaus programmers did this. They > > >> > should have tried to work with this project and combine efforts > > >> > instead of going on their own and then using the same goal. Very > > >> > frustrating.... > > > >> > -- > > >> > Arthur Kalmenson > > > >> > On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 12:47 PM, Charlie Collins > > >> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> >> I'm down with renaming the "shell" goal, sure, but how about "shell" > > >> >> or "runshell" or something rather than "launch"? > > > >> >> mvn gwtmaven:shell > > >> >> mvn gwtmaven package > > >> >> mvn gwtmaven test > > > >> >> etc > > > >> >> ? > > > >> >> On Nov 25, 10:14 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >> >>> While we're at it, then why not change the somewhat misnamed 'gwt' > > >> >>> task to be 'launch' or 'hosted' or 'hosted-mode'; so we'd have: mvn > > >> >>> gwtmaven:launch > > > >> >>> My motive is that we're about to force everyone to re-learn how to > > >> >>> launch, we may as well clear out the entire garage of target names, > > >> >>> etc. :-) > > > >> >>> -jesse > > > >> >>> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 10:06 AM, Darren Hartford > > > >> >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> >>> > gwtmaven +1 (matches the project name) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "gwt-maven" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/gwt-maven?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
