Has this prefix been changed?
On Nov 27, 7:21 am, "Arthur Kalmenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm really fine with any prefix change, just as long as I don't have
> to launch it with the current full package name :)
>
> --
> Arthur Kalmenson
>
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 3:58 PM, Charlie Collins
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I don't think anyone likes the idea of changing the prefix, but I
> > think we have to, telling everyone to do their own "pluginGroup" is
> > going to be a bigger pain than just changing the prefix, I think (if
> > we don't change we will be constantly explaining this).
>
> > How about "gwtm"? Short for the name of the project "GWT-Maven".
>
> > Oh, and TotSP stands for "Temple of the Screaming Penguin" (screaming-
> > penguin.com) - my blog/personal projects site that I so cleverly named
> > about 10 years ago ;).
>
> > On Nov 25, 3:18 pm, "Mirko Nasato" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I've tried to digest the idea of changing the prefix for a few hours
> >> now, but it still doesn't go down well with me.
>
> >> Personally I would rather keep 'gwt' and add a pluginGroup to my
> >> settings.xml. We (in my office) already have a gwt section in
> >> settings.xml to declare a gwt.platform variable anyway.
>
> >> If there really is no other option than changing the prefix, then
> >> honestly I would avoid anything with 'maven' in it. I mean: all maven
> >> plugins have 'maven' in their name, but that's not a good reason to
> >> have it in the prefix as well.
>
> >> I'd rather use 'tgwt' ('t' for TotSP, whatever that means ;-) or
> >> something similarly short.
>
> >> Cheers
>
> >> Mirko
>
> >> 2008/11/25 Arthur Kalmenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >> > "mvn gwtmaven:shell" looks good to me, or "mvn gwtmaven:hosted" is good
> >> > too.
>
> >> > I'm very unhappy with how the codehaus programmers did this. They
> >> > should have tried to work with this project and combine efforts
> >> > instead of going on their own and then using the same goal. Very
> >> > frustrating....
>
> >> > --
> >> > Arthur Kalmenson
>
> >> > On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 12:47 PM, Charlie Collins
> >> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> >> I'm down with renaming the "shell" goal, sure, but how about "shell"
> >> >> or "runshell" or something rather than "launch"?
>
> >> >> mvn gwtmaven:shell
> >> >> mvn gwtmaven package
> >> >> mvn gwtmaven test
>
> >> >> etc
>
> >> >> ?
>
> >> >> On Nov 25, 10:14 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> >>> While we're at it, then why not change the somewhat misnamed 'gwt'
> >> >>> task to be 'launch' or 'hosted' or 'hosted-mode'; so we'd have: mvn
> >> >>> gwtmaven:launch
>
> >> >>> My motive is that we're about to force everyone to re-learn how to
> >> >>> launch, we may as well clear out the entire garage of target names,
> >> >>> etc. :-)
>
> >> >>> -jesse
>
> >> >>> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 10:06 AM, Darren Hartford
>
> >> >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >>> > gwtmaven +1 (matches the project name)
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"gwt-maven" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/gwt-maven?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
