It is not neccessarily_ not_ science to try to find evidence to support
a hyphothesis. And unscientific efforts can be made to break one. The
important issue there is objectivity.
Fran
Lavolta Press
http://www.lavoltapress.com
Marc Carlson wrote:
Fran:
I don't think that discovering something is science, per se.
I think it has to do with rigor and whether you are using the
scientific method.
Examine the evidence, come up with a hypothesis and test it to
failure. Revise and repeat until it ceases to fail, at which point
you probably have a valid hypothesis.
Where the problem is has to do with whether people are trying to find
evidence to support a hypothesis, or trying to find a way to break the
hypothsis (one is not science, the other is).
Marc
_______________________________________________
h-costume mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume
_______________________________________________
h-costume mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume
