I have made the dress from Patterns of Fashion too; it was my first
Victorian costume - and didn't know I wasn't good enough to make it
correctly at the time. It did eventually fit and I wore it for 4-5 years at
the Dickens Fairs in San Francisco. That's why I recognized the picture so
quickly.

However, I meant that I had never made the PI pattern and wondered if anyone
had any experience with it and any of the other PI patterns.

LynnD


On 3/26/08, Suzi Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> At 14:35 26/03/2008, you wrote:
> >
> >In a message dated 3/25/2008 8:36:26 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >
> >haven't  seen anything extant that looks like the PI Tea Bodice
> >
> >
> >**************
> >
> >Again....it is taken from an extant garment and completely worked out  by
> >Janet Arnold in "Patterns of Fashion, vol. II"....it's the 1st gown
> >in the  book.
> >There is a complete pattern and a view of the inside of the bodice.
> Pages  20
> >& 21.
>
> I've actually seen this gown for real - and made a copy, using the
> Arnold pattern for a starter. The dress is rather an odd shape - the
> lady appears to have a 44" bust, and a very small waist, from what I
> remember - not noticeable in the drawings. It's a very pretty chine
> (sorry accent missing) silk, in a mauvey shade, and is very
> attractive. I would not call it a tea gown, just a day dress. Tea
> gowns, to me, are a much later fashion.
>
> Suzi
>
> _______________________________________________
> h-costume mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume
>
_______________________________________________
h-costume mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume

Reply via email to