Or you could get on Skype and hold it up to your web cam for your
long-distance friend to see. That way someone can look without making a
copy for them.


This, however, is falling victim to the "million examples" runaround. Someone asserts their desires or needs are more important than the need of the creator of the work to get paid (and also all the other people involved in creating, producing, and marketing a work). They produce an example. You counter it by explaining some workaround. Then they produce another example. You counter that. They produce another example. And on, and on, and on.

When this is done, it is not a person with any sincere desire to do something without violating copyright law. It's just a runaround intended to wear out people seriously trying to explain. And as I've mentioned, it's usually the exact same people doing the same runarounds in every discussion.

The bottom line is, the desire or need of someone to use someone else's work does not make them the most important person on the planet for whom special exemptions should be made.

Fran

_______________________________________________
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume

Reply via email to