My first inspection of the recovered database reveals that the database seems to be fully intact. I compared it with a backup from the day before the corruption happened. The exact same set of tables is there and the record counts in corresponding tables is the same or the differences are small enough to be explained by the time difference. I can not say anything about the contents of individual cells but all queries I did returned expected results.
So this makes me come back to my previous question: does it make sense that 199 considers a database corrupt when 196 does not? And if so: which of both is right? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "H2 Database" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/h2-database. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/h2-database/9aacffc8-59b2-4932-93ca-10d861f10e2c%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
