Hi Venkateswarlu. The prtvtoc of the CTD is ok.

root at sapaxdb03 # scdidadm -L d145
145      sapaxdb02:/dev/rdsk/c7t500604844A3779D8d178 /dev/did/rdsk/d145
145      sapaxdb01:/dev/rdsk/c7t500604844A3779D7d178 /dev/did/rdsk/d145
145      sapaxdb03:/dev/rdsk/c5t500604844A3779D8d178 /dev/did/rdsk/d145
145      sapaxdb04:/dev/rdsk/c3t500604844A3779D7d178 /dev/did/rdsk/d145
root at sapaxdb03 # prtvtoc /dev/rdsk/c5t500604844A3779D8d178s0
* /dev/rdsk/c5t500604844A3779D8d178s0 (volume "SZ1_NCD") partition map
*
* Dimensions:
*     512 bytes/sector
*      64 sectors/track
*      60 tracks/cylinder
*    3840 sectors/cylinder
*   46500 cylinders
*   46498 accessible cylinders
*
* Flags:
*   1: unmountable
*  10: read-only
*
*                          First     Sector    Last
* Partition  Tag  Flags    Sector     Count    Sector  Mount Directory
       2      5    01          0 178552320 178552319
       7     15    01          0 178552320 178552319
root at sapaxdb03 #


Now, I have already did the devfsadm, scdidadm -r before... I didn't
scgdevs...
So I ll try that later to see how it goes....and I ll let you know.

Thanks



On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Venkateswarlu Tella <
Venkateswarlu.Tella at sun.com> wrote:

> Hi Fred,
> Okay. So it looks the problem with DID.
> Let's start with the VTOC for the disk also.
>
> # scdidadm -L d145
> <<< You will see CTD disk here>>
> # prtvtoc <ctd_disk_path>
>
> The scdpmd used <did_path>s0 to check the disk status.
> --Check that ctd disk is accessible through s0 slice ...
>
> After enusuring that for ctd paths are fine, run the following commands
> # devfsadm
> # scdidadm -C
> # scdidadm -r
> # scgdevs
>
> Now check the DID paths s0 and s2 slices whether they are accessible.
> If it is then scdpm will mark the disk as OK after 10mins which the probe
> interval.
>
> Thanks
> -Venku
>
>
> On 10/29/09 16:06, Fred wrote:
>
>> Hi Venkateswarlu. I think you got the point.
>> Actually prtvtoc /dev/did/rdsk/d145s2 says no such device ...where I can
>> access the disk through format and also Veritas   is managing them.
>>
>> So I don't know why is that... is it possible to fix this now? Veritas ha
>> put data on it
>>
>> Fred
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Venkateswarlu Tella <
>> Venkateswarlu.Tella at sun.com <mailto:Venkateswarlu.Tella at sun.com>> 
>> wrote:
>>
>>    Hi Fred,
>>    Can you check whether the DID devices are accessible?
>>    What is o/p of
>>    # prtvtoc /dev/did/rdsk/d145s2
>>    # dd if=/dev/did/rdsk/d145s0 of=/dev/null count=1
>>
>>    I might also helps to check the syslog messages to see for any other
>>    error messages related to the "Failed" devices.
>>
>>    Thanks
>>    -Venku
>>
>>
>>    On 10/29/09 15:33, Fred wrote:
>>
>>        Hi Joerg.
>>
>>        I already tried format -e etc etc and everything seems to be
>>        similar to the other disks...
>>
>>        If I try to look at the reservation keys on those disks I got an
>>        error like couldn't open the device.... errno 6.
>>        I think somehow Veritas can manage the disks but Sun Cluster
>>        could not.. It there a way to put manually a key (like Sun
>>        cluster does) on a disk?
>>
>>        FRED
>>
>>                On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 5:29 PM, joerg noack <
>> jnoack at gmx.de
>>        <mailto:jnoack at gmx.de> <mailto:jnoack at gmx.de
>>
>>        <mailto:jnoack at gmx.de>>> wrote:
>>
>>           if I remember correct scdpm just makes a SCSI inquiry to test. I
>>           would read the vtoc and
>>           format -e >> scsi>> inq to dig deeper. Probably there is simply
>> a
>>           connection issue or some config speciality of EMC ;)
>>
>>           HTH,
>>           jono
>>           --
>>           This message posted from opensolaris.org
>>        <http://opensolaris.org> <http://opensolaris.org>
>>
>>
>>           _______________________________________________
>>           ha-clusters-discuss mailing list
>>           ha-clusters-discuss at opensolaris.org
>>        <mailto:ha-clusters-discuss at opensolaris.org>
>>           <mailto:ha-clusters-discuss at opensolaris.org
>>        <mailto:ha-clusters-discuss at opensolaris.org>>
>>
>>
>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ha-clusters-discuss
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>        _______________________________________________
>>        ha-clusters-discuss mailing list
>>        ha-clusters-discuss at opensolaris.org
>>        <mailto:ha-clusters-discuss at opensolaris.org>
>>        http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ha-clusters-discuss
>>
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/ha-clusters-discuss/attachments/20091029/add8196b/attachment-0001.html>

Reply via email to