sorry I concluded wrong based on this post:

>The scdpmd used <did_path>s0 to check the disk status.
>--Check that ctd disk is accessible through s0 slice ...

thanks,
joerg


-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 19:16:32 +0530
> Von: Venkateswarlu Tella <Venkateswarlu.Tella at Sun.COM>
> An: joerg noack <jnoack at gmx.de>
> CC: ha-clusters-discuss at opensolaris.org
> Betreff: Re: [ha-clusters-discuss] did device FAILED

> Hi,
> I would like not be mandated that s0 has to there for a disk to make scdpm
> work.
> If you you are able to access the disk using s2 slice(a convention that 
> represents the whole disk), then scdpm is failing means it can be treated
> as a 
> bug in dpm.
> 
> Thanks
> -Venku
> 
> 
> On 10/29/09 17:45, joerg noack wrote:
> > as venku writes there need to be a slice0. So if nothing helps I would
> make a dummy definition of slice0 and try again.
> > 
> > HTH,
> > jono

-- 
Neu: GMX DSL bis 50.000 kBit/s und 200,- Euro Startguthaben!
http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/dsl02

Reply via email to