On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Matthias Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I don't want to risk tainting the AL2 code with GPL fragments, and I > think that risk increases the closer together we bring differently > licensed source code. There might also be license technicalities like "I > can checkout the whole -extras repo, so you distribute code under the > GPL, so it all has to be GPL". I believe our repositories should house > only Apache 2.0 licensed code. > > After a brief discussion with Michael and Sean about this in IRC, and reading the Matt's above quoted note, which I very much agree with and even foresee if we allow conflicting licenses in -extras, I am changing my vote to +1 for allowing only ASL-compatible code in -extras. -- Ali B / dmondark http://www.awhitebox.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to habari-dev@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/habari-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
