-1 to all all recognized FOSS licensed code in -extras. Even though the focus of the vote is on what the purpose of -extras is, whether to serve as a farm club for Habari development, or to serve as a central clearing house of all code related to Habari. I'd rather restrict -extras to code that has been licensed with an ASL compatible license. I do want hp.o to be a central clearing house for all extensions related to Habari, no matter how they're licensed, but feel this would be best served by the web-based mechanism upon which work has started (and which I hope is publicly available soon).
Rick On Dec 4, 9:43 pm, Sean Coates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would still like to hear what Rasmus has to say, if he responds. > > However, unless that reveals some sort of unexpected evidence to the > contrary, I think that allowing GPL code on hp.o is dangerous at best. > None of us want a run-in with the FSF, and the risks simply aren't > worth the "reward" of allowing a broader licensing regime on hp.o. > > So, my vote for now is -1 (== no GPL code on hp.o) > > I do think we should expedite some sort of automated plugin system in > light of this discussion, though... > > S --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to habari-dev@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/habari-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
