On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 11:40 AM, rick c <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -1 to all all recognized FOSS licensed code in -extras. > > Even though the focus of the vote is on what the purpose of -extras > is, whether to serve as a farm club for Habari development, or to > serve as a central clearing house of all code related to Habari. I'd > rather restrict -extras to code that has been licensed with an ASL > compatible license. I do want hp.o to be a central clearing house for > all extensions related to Habari, no matter how they're licensed, but > feel this would be best served by the web-based mechanism upon which > work has started (and which I hope is publicly available soon).
I still don't understand how having a page listing a GPL-licensed plugin with the Habari logo and branding all over it is somehow less a potentially conflicting message than simply hosting the code which users will never look at... Since this was one of the big arguments presented against GPL in Extras, where only a URL links it to Habari, can someone please explain to me how the same does not seem to apply to a directory with significantly more linking it to Habari? And, for the record, I still think we're screwing over our users and future community developers. I'm disappointed I seem to be the only one who has a problem with that... --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/habari-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
