Why are we discussing a google-code hosted BP when afaik is none? BP is developed on github now, and I don't think you can just include it. As for removing it, well, I don't have a strong opinion.
Christian -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Chris J. Davis Sent: 20. februar 2009 17:50 To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: [habari-dev] Re: BluePrint I am not in favor of using the goog hoselyed version of blueprint and I am not in favor of removing it from 3rdparty. Including a solid framework for theme developers to use is a good thing, not a bad one. There is nothing that says anyone has to use it and it doesn't really adversley affect our foot print. I am firmly -1 for removing blueprint unless a solid technical reason is offered up. Sent from my iPhone On Feb 20, 2009, at 10:27 AM, Owen Winkler <[email protected]> wrote: > > Chris Meller wrote: >> My only thought there is that paranoid people (like h0bbel ;)) would >> freak out because now Google can track them. It would also preclude >> the >> possibility of running Mzingi locally if you don't have internet >> access. > > Both good points, and the latter would even affect me, since I often > do > just that. > > I'm interested in hearing others weight these options, since I think > there is a reasonable list of pros and cons in both directions. > > Owen > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/habari-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
