You may have missed one important line from the previous thread, where Owen said "I'm not sure if that's written down somewhere, but that's the intent - no attribution of anything in core beyond the included copyright file." This gives me the impression that your theme will stay in -extras until you agree to have the attribution and link removed.
On Jul 14, 8:52 pm, luke <[email protected]> wrote: > Wow. What an amazing response! I'll try to address the points raised > as best I can, if I miss anything important please let me know and > I'll try to address it as well. I'm only human :) > > These are the responses to the theme contribution questions. Please > see the other posts for responses to sponsorship and hp.o. > > > Indeed of we had them create a new theme for inclusion with the download, > > it would have to asl licensed which means the credit would have to be > > removable. > > Ahh. Cool. This is something I did not know. Just to quote the bit > that i thought was pertinent [1]: > > Section 4: Redistribution. Clause 3: "You must retain, in the Source > form of any Derivative Works that You distribute, all copyright, > patent, trademark, and _attribution_ notices from the Source form of > the Work, excluding those notices that do not pertain to any part of > the Derivative Works; and " (emphasis mine) > > Not sure how this sits? Obviously part of what we doing is to increase > Squareweave's profile. The attribution is a bit important. I think > it's also important to distinguish between attribution in the theme > xml, from attribution in the client side output. We would like both. > As far as i understand the ASL and the Habari policy as defined here > [2], others shouldn't change the attribution in the XML, but anyone > can change the attribution in the footer. I'm not sure why you would, > except to customise it for your own use (which is fine, and wouldn't > require committing back to -extras). Just thinking out loud a bit > here. > > > First, any theme has potential to be elevated (to use a loaded word) to > > core status. It's just a matter of getting community consensus. I know > > there has been some opinion to drop k2 from core, and a new Habari-specific > > theme would be a good replacement. > > Sure. We would want it to get there because it's shit-hot. Not for any > other reason. > > Cheers! > > [1]http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html > [2]http://wiki.habariproject.org/en/Extras_Repository#Attribution --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/habari-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
