What does this have to do with sponsorship?
On Jul 14, 9:12 pm, Realpolitik <[email protected]> wrote:
> You may have missed one important line from the previous thread, where
> Owen said "I'm not sure if that's written down somewhere, but that's
> the intent - no attribution of anything in core beyond the included
> copyright file." This gives me the impression that your theme will
> stay in -extras until you agree to have the attribution and link
> removed.
>
> On Jul 14, 8:52 pm, luke <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Wow. What an amazing response! I'll try to address the points raised
> > as best I can, if I miss anything important please let me know and
> > I'll try to address it as well. I'm only human :)
>
> > These are the responses to the theme contribution questions. Please
> > see the other posts for responses to sponsorship and hp.o.
>
> > > Indeed of we had them create a new theme for inclusion with the download,
> > > it would have to asl licensed which means the credit would have to be
> > > removable.
>
> > Ahh. Cool. This is something I did not know. Just to quote the bit
> > that i thought was pertinent [1]:
>
> > Section 4: Redistribution. Clause 3: "You must retain, in the Source
> > form of any Derivative Works that You distribute, all copyright,
> > patent, trademark, and _attribution_ notices from the Source form of
> > the Work, excluding those notices that do not pertain to any part of
> > the Derivative Works; and " (emphasis mine)
>
> > Not sure how this sits? Obviously part of what we doing is to increase
> > Squareweave's profile. The attribution is a bit important. I think
> > it's also important to distinguish between attribution in the theme
> > xml, from attribution in the client side output. We would like both.
> > As far as i understand the ASL and the Habari policy as defined here
> > [2], others shouldn't change the attribution in the XML, but anyone
> > can change the attribution in the footer. I'm not sure why you would,
> > except to customise it for your own use (which is fine, and wouldn't
> > require committing back to -extras). Just thinking out loud a bit
> > here.
>
> > > First, any theme has potential to be elevated (to use a loaded word) to
> > > core status. It's just a matter of getting community consensus. I know
> > > there has been some opinion to drop k2 from core, and a new
> > > Habari-specific theme would be a good replacement.
>
> > Sure. We would want it to get there because it's shit-hot. Not for any
> > other reason.
>
> > Cheers!
>
> > [1]http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html
> > [2]http://wiki.habariproject.org/en/Extras_Repository#Attribution
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/habari-dev
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
