Yes, i'm aware - splitting the threads was my idea. But what does creating a Habari theme have to do with sponsorship?
On Jul 14, 9:37 pm, Realpolitik <[email protected]> wrote: > He split the original email which had three distinct proposals in it, > into three different emails. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Jul 14, 2009, at 8:37 PM, Realpolitik <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > As with the other thread, what does this have to do with sponsorship? > > > On Jul 14, 8:52 pm, luke <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Wow. What an amazing response! I'll try to address the points raised > >> as best I can, if I miss anything important please let me know and > >> I'll try to address it as well. I'm only human :) > > >> These are the responses to the theme contribution questions. Please > >> see the other posts for responses to sponsorship and hp.o. > > >>> Indeed of we had them create a new theme for inclusion with the > >>> download, it would have to asl licensed which means the credit > >>> would have to be removable. > > >> Ahh. Cool. This is something I did not know. Just to quote the bit > >> that i thought was pertinent [1]: > > >> Section 4: Redistribution. Clause 3: "You must retain, in the Source > >> form of any Derivative Works that You distribute, all copyright, > >> patent, trademark, and _attribution_ notices from the Source form of > >> the Work, excluding those notices that do not pertain to any part of > >> the Derivative Works; and " (emphasis mine) > > >> Not sure how this sits? Obviously part of what we doing is to > >> increase > >> Squareweave's profile. The attribution is a bit important. I think > >> it's also important to distinguish between attribution in the theme > >> xml, from attribution in the client side output. We would like both. > >> As far as i understand the ASL and the Habari policy as defined here > >> [2], others shouldn't change the attribution in the XML, but anyone > >> can change the attribution in the footer. I'm not sure why you would, > >> except to customise it for your own use (which is fine, and wouldn't > >> require committing back to -extras). Just thinking out loud a bit > >> here. > > >>> First, any theme has potential to be elevated (to use a loaded > >>> word) to core status. It's just a matter of getting community > >>> consensus. I know there has been some opinion to drop k2 from > >>> core, and a new Habari-specific theme would be a good replacement. > > >> Sure. We would want it to get there because it's shit-hot. Not for > >> any > >> other reason. > > >> Cheers! > > >> [1]http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html > >> [2]http://wiki.habariproject.org/en/Extras_Repository#Attribution --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/habari-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
