I definitely think we should take Squareweave up on the offer of redesign help.
Having a central organization/person should help to create a more coherent strategy. However, we should be sure to include the various voices who have thought about the redesign in the past as well. Honestly, I think this is the sort of matter which would work best with a single chat/call, making sure all interested parties are present. We can iron out a plan for how to proceed with the development of a design strategy and execute it. On Jul 15, 2009, at 6:22 AM, Realpolitik wrote: > > Ok, so the "sponsorship" part of the title was just left for > continuity? That makes much more sense. > > On Jul 14, 9:51 pm, "Michael C. Harris" <[email protected]> > wrote: >> 2009/7/15 Realpolitik <[email protected]>: >> >> >> >>> What does this have to do with sponsorship? >> >> If you're talking about the subject header, Luke has just copied the >> original subject line. He's clearly talking about the hp.o redesign >> raised in the previous thread. >> >> -- >> Michael C. Harris, School of CS&IT, RMIT >> Universityhttp://twofishcreative.com/michael/blog >> IRC: michaeltwofish #habari > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/habari-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
