> Having a central organization/person should help to create a more > coherent strategy. However, we should be sure to include the various > voices who have thought about the redesign in the past as well.
Yup. It would be disrespectful and foolhardy of us to do otherwise. Stand on the shoulders of giants :) > > While I don't disagree with that, I don't think that we need someone > > else to step in to "help us manage ourselves". I think that for the > > most part, we're doing a pretty good job as-is. Could we use a bit > > more organization? Of course, but do we need some 3rd party to tell us > > how to do it? Probably not... > > There is no 3rd party, there is only us; Luke and Will are not some > corporation who has come along to tell us what to do, they use Habari > regularly, they launch it for their clients, they hang out in IRC. > I'd hope that in this way, we'd just play a "keeping it on track" role, rather than a 3rd party "this is what you should do" role. > The question is about recognition, and Squareweave has asked up front > for particulars, should the redesign succeed. That's perfectly > reasonable, so let's focus on that. I think it's obvious that if we > launch a new design there would be a blog post on hp.o that would give > recognition to the designer, whoever it is. I hope that's a given. > > My understanding is that the other thing Squareweave would like is a > link on hp.o saying they did the design, for the duration of the > design's use. Luke/Will, is that right? That is exactly correct. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/habari-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
