Scott Merrill wrote: > > Be advised that changing the bylaws once they've been ratified is a > non-trivial action. We need to make sure we get these as right as > possible up front.
Actually, it *can* be quite trivial. The way we set up the ASF, it simply requires ratification by the Board. Once there's a significant number of members, it could get messier -- but again, if it's set up simply the change is likewise simple. Just leave it that the board can change the bylaws, that members can reverse board decisions, and that members can call special meetings. The problem with membership that the ASF has encountered is one of scale. I don't know if Habari is likely to scale to the membership of several hundreds that the ASF has, but that has gotten awkward. -- #ken P-)} Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Ken.Coar.Org/ Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/ "Millennium hand and shrimp!" --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/habari-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
