On Apr 15, 2009, at 22:54, Andy C wrote:
> > > > On Apr 16, 1:40 am, Sean T Evans <[email protected]> wrote: >> Andy C wrote: >> >>> 'The primary manifestation of this benefit is having solid legal >>> ground to defend against intellectual property and other claims.' >> >>> And the Habari blogging platform is so important,, so significant >>> and >>> so massive that we anticipate a lot of legal claims and corporate >>> law >>> suits that could somehow threaten the project's existence. >> >> It would only take one. Lawyers are expensive. > > If Habari continues to preserve its current legal status, who would be > liable for any law suit lodged tomorrow - Owen, you, me, Matt, all of > us, who ? > > Seriously, who ? > Not a simple question, but the simple answer is, whoever someone chose to name in a lawsuit. The most visible folks are probably the four of us that started it, but other people become more (and less) visible over time, so that list could go from one person to the entire committer pool to the person who gave bad advice on the users@ list. -- Happiness isn't something you experience; it's something you remember. Oscar Levant --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/habari-users -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
