I only used the HackRF at 2 Mhz to make the comparison as similar as possible. Normally, I wouldn't even consider doing so.

On 4/3/2015 3:00 PM, Jared Boone wrote:
On Apr 3, 2015, at 11:18, Rich S <richnsand...@gmail.com> wrote:

I put together a quick Adobe document with pictures and settings comparing the 
two and attached it to a previous email.
That's a good summary of your process. Thanks.

Here's why I would recommend against using HackRF with a 2MHz sampling rate:

https://github.com/mossmann/hackrf/wiki/Tips-and-Tricks

If you operate the HackRF at 8MHz with a GNU Radio 4:1 decimating low-pass 
filter to reach your desired 2MHz sampling rate, you should see better 
performance in the presence of noise in adjacent spectrum that would otherwise 
alias. I have no idea if the various other SDR software uses this technique.

        - Jared

_______________________________________________
HackRF-dev mailing list
HackRF-dev@greatscottgadgets.com
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev

_______________________________________________
HackRF-dev mailing list
HackRF-dev@greatscottgadgets.com
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev

Reply via email to