HAMA-410 must be fixed and tested before release 0.4.0. It's heavily related with other many next issues I think e.g., InputOutput system, Fault tolerant, ..., .etc.
If that architecture is not good, we should re-implement it. Miklos, How's HAMA-409 going? On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:05 PM, Thomas Jungblut <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey guys, > > I guess we have to speak about what we want to do next and in which order. > And maybe what our goals are for the next monts. > > We have 3 larger tasks in the Pipe and their assignee: > - HAMA-410 Multiple Tasks per Groom (Edward) > - HAMA-409 Pregel API (Miklos, Edward, me) > - Fault Tolerance and various subtasks, e.G. HAMA-199 > > What are our plans for the next months and 0.4.0 release? > > I saw Edward already tweet about several project goals like "new 5+ > committers, 3+ PPMC members". > > Where do you see us in 3-4 months? > > Best regards, > Thomas > -- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @eddieyoon
