> What's the current state of HAMA-410? Dirty but almost done. Now I am trying to test and figure out potential problems.
2011/8/17 Miklós Erdélyi <[email protected]>: > For HAMA-409 a simple graph input system has been designed (similar to > Goldenorb) to replace the current code depending on GPL code > fragments. There'll be a simple text-based built-in implementation for > reading graphs. > After mavenization is done, it should be easy to add hama-graph as a > separate package. > > What's the current state of HAMA-410? > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Edward J. Yoon <[email protected]> wrote: >> HAMA-410 must be fixed and tested before release 0.4.0. It's heavily >> related with other many next issues I think e.g., InputOutput system, >> Fault tolerant, ..., .etc. >> >> If that architecture is not good, we should re-implement it. >> >> Miklos, How's HAMA-409 going? >> >> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:05 PM, Thomas Jungblut >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hey guys, >>> >>> I guess we have to speak about what we want to do next and in which order. >>> And maybe what our goals are for the next monts. >>> >>> We have 3 larger tasks in the Pipe and their assignee: >>> - HAMA-410 Multiple Tasks per Groom (Edward) >>> - HAMA-409 Pregel API (Miklos, Edward, me) >>> - Fault Tolerance and various subtasks, e.G. HAMA-199 >>> >>> What are our plans for the next months and 0.4.0 release? >>> >>> I saw Edward already tweet about several project goals like "new 5+ >>> committers, 3+ PPMC members". >>> >>> Where do you see us in 3-4 months? >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Thomas >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon >> @eddieyoon >> > -- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @eddieyoon
