> > Dirty but almost done. Now I am trying to test and figure out > potential problems. >
That is fine. I think you should make a list of what you've figured out, commit the patch and create subtasks for the problems. So we can merge the stuff from HAMA-409 into the new task structure. For HAMA-409 a simple graph input system has been designed (similar to > Goldenorb) to replace the current code depending on GPL code. There'll be a simple text-based built-in implementation for > reading graphs. I'm not to sure if we should include GPL code in our project, since we have some similar input parsers for the examples (Text/Sequence File). We just have to refactor them and extract an open/configurable API. After mavenization is done, it should be easy to add hama-graph as a > separate package. > Definitely +1. And the others? Do you have an opinion on these topics? 2011/8/17 Edward J. Yoon <[email protected]> > > What's the current state of HAMA-410? > > Dirty but almost done. Now I am trying to test and figure out > potential problems. > > 2011/8/17 Miklós Erdélyi <[email protected]>: > > For HAMA-409 a simple graph input system has been designed (similar to > > Goldenorb) to replace the current code depending on GPL code > > fragments. There'll be a simple text-based built-in implementation for > > reading graphs. > > After mavenization is done, it should be easy to add hama-graph as a > > separate package. > > > > What's the current state of HAMA-410? > > > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Edward J. Yoon <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> HAMA-410 must be fixed and tested before release 0.4.0. It's heavily > >> related with other many next issues I think e.g., InputOutput system, > >> Fault tolerant, ..., .etc. > >> > >> If that architecture is not good, we should re-implement it. > >> > >> Miklos, How's HAMA-409 going? > >> > >> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:05 PM, Thomas Jungblut > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> Hey guys, > >>> > >>> I guess we have to speak about what we want to do next and in which > order. > >>> And maybe what our goals are for the next monts. > >>> > >>> We have 3 larger tasks in the Pipe and their assignee: > >>> - HAMA-410 Multiple Tasks per Groom (Edward) > >>> - HAMA-409 Pregel API (Miklos, Edward, me) > >>> - Fault Tolerance and various subtasks, e.G. HAMA-199 > >>> > >>> What are our plans for the next months and 0.4.0 release? > >>> > >>> I saw Edward already tweet about several project goals like "new 5+ > >>> committers, 3+ PPMC members". > >>> > >>> Where do you see us in 3-4 months? > >>> > >>> Best regards, > >>> Thomas > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon > >> @eddieyoon > >> > > > > > > -- > Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon > @eddieyoon > -- Thomas Jungblut Berlin mobile: 0170-3081070 business: [email protected] private: [email protected]
