[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-439?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13115700#comment-13115700
]
Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli commented on HAMA-439:
----------------------------------------------
bq. Any idea to the client package? Why do we need an extra module for the
client?
I wanted to separate the user facing APIs separated from the implementation
details completely, so introduced that to include all the client side tools. In
the short term, it may not be big deal, but I can see potential benefits. We
can club them later as we move through this ticket if we don't realize any such
benefit.
> Reorganize modules for YARN/MR-NextGen integration
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HAMA-439
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-439
> Project: Hama
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Affects Versions: 0.3.0
> Reporter: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
> Assignee: Thomas Jungblut
> Fix For: 0.4.0
>
> Attachments: HAMA-349-20110927.txt, HAMA-349-move-20110927.sh,
> HAMA-439.patch
>
>
> I'd like to get started on HamaV2 to work with YARN/MR-nextgen.
> Here's what I think should be the module structure:
> - *api*: Code from HamaV1 related to APIs that will be moved to this new
> module. This will mainly have the BSP APIs: _BSP_, _BSPPeerInterface_ and all
> the related records like _BSPMessage_, _BSPMessageBundle etc.
> - *core*: Current/HamaV1 server code. Will have the current
> _BSPMaster_/_GroomServer_ infrastructure. We should probably rename it to
> {{classic-server}} or something similar.
> - *server*: New Hama server implementation to work with YARN. Will have
> _BSPApplicationMaster_, _BSPTask_ and related code.
> - *client*: Code from HamaV1 related to client that will be moved to this
> new module. This will mainly have the client-submission classes/interfaces
> like _BSPJob_, _BSPJobClient_, _JobStatus_ etc. It will be configurable to
> either run with the classic-server implementation or with YARN.
> There will not be any package changes but only code-moves across modules, so
> we will be backwards compatible.
> How does it look? Any thoughts/suggestions?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
