[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-439?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas Jungblut updated HAMA-439:
---------------------------------
Attachment: HAMA-349-move_v2.sh
HAMA-349-move_v2.patch
Okay, I've made a new move sh and a patch which you can apply afterwards.
This was the worst work I've ever made. Seriously? I would prefer doing it
directly in SVN.
I left the client module aside and made core/API compilable.
It is against the branch.
You know, first start the bash script then patch the files.
> Reorganize modules for YARN/MR-NextGen integration
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HAMA-439
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-439
> Project: Hama
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Affects Versions: 0.3.0
> Reporter: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
> Assignee: Thomas Jungblut
> Fix For: 0.4.0
>
> Attachments: HAMA-349-20110927.txt, HAMA-349-move-20110927.sh,
> HAMA-349-move_v2.patch, HAMA-349-move_v2.sh, HAMA-439.patch
>
>
> I'd like to get started on HamaV2 to work with YARN/MR-nextgen.
> Here's what I think should be the module structure:
> - *api*: Code from HamaV1 related to APIs that will be moved to this new
> module. This will mainly have the BSP APIs: _BSP_, _BSPPeerInterface_ and all
> the related records like _BSPMessage_, _BSPMessageBundle etc.
> - *core*: Current/HamaV1 server code. Will have the current
> _BSPMaster_/_GroomServer_ infrastructure. We should probably rename it to
> {{classic-server}} or something similar.
> - *server*: New Hama server implementation to work with YARN. Will have
> _BSPApplicationMaster_, _BSPTask_ and related code.
> - *client*: Code from HamaV1 related to client that will be moved to this
> new module. This will mainly have the client-submission classes/interfaces
> like _BSPJob_, _BSPJobClient_, _JobStatus_ etc. It will be configurable to
> either run with the classic-server implementation or with YARN.
> There will not be any package changes but only code-moves across modules, so
> we will be backwards compatible.
> How does it look? Any thoughts/suggestions?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
