Tom Bagby wrote: >> Yeah, I got that. I've removed that from the TODO. >> > > Sorry, I can ramble when I'm excited, Haml does that to me. > Oh, no problem, I get the same way. Also it was a helpful reminder; I hadn't /actually/ removed it from the TODO until you reminded me about it ;). > I declare you a genius. That's exactly what I'll do and yes, it > should make it free when undef'ed. > > Last comment about what I said about refactoring/current code state, I > almost certainly would not have maintained interest/enthusiasm this > long except that Haml implementation is very nice and pleasant to work > with. Well organized in such a way that begged to be hacked on :) > Wow, that's really great to hear. I'm kind of self-conscious about my code... Haml in particular I've felt has been getting pretty messy. It's good to hear that it's not totally entangled. I still want to clean it up for 2.0, though.
- Nathan --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
