Will you be applying prerender_static_tags.diff in the near future? Wasn't sure if it was clear that it was yet another distinct patch. Have more stuff I'd like to submit, need to see where you actually take the working version though to merge and diff against.
Thanks, Tom On Jun 5, 3:05 am, Nathan Weizenbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tom Bagby wrote: > >> Yeah, I got that. I've removed that from the TODO. > > > Sorry, I can ramble when I'm excited, Haml does that to me. > > Oh, no problem, I get the same way. Also it was a helpful reminder; I > hadn't /actually/ removed it from the TODO until you reminded me about > it ;).> I declare you a genius. That's exactly what I'll do and yes, it > > should make it free when undef'ed. > > > Last comment about what I said about refactoring/current code state, I > > almost certainly would not have maintained interest/enthusiasm this > > long except that Haml implementation is very nice and pleasant to work > > with. Well organized in such a way that begged to be hacked on :) > > Wow, that's really great to hear. I'm kind of self-conscious about my > code... Haml in particular I've felt has been getting pretty messy. It's > good to hear that it's not totally entangled. I still want to clean it > up for 2.0, though. > > - Nathan --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
