We thought about that, but we wanted to emphasize that it would involve sacrificing prettiness more than we wanted to emphasize that it gave speed increases.
- Nathan Jeffrey Hardy wrote: > Maybe you should name the option :speedy ;-) > > On 23-Jul-07, at 9:30 PM, Nathan Weizenbaum wrote: > > >> We are planning on something similar to a :compact switch. It's more >> likely to be an :ugly switch, to emphasize that you're trading >> nice-looking HTML for optimization (the Haml rendering will be >> significantly faster as well). >> >> - Nathan >> >> Mislav Marohnić wrote: >> >>> On 7/23/07, *Evgeny* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: >>> >>> It is old. It works. Its great. Its Sass only. >>> >>> >>> No, I've meant that the invocation form is old. Sass::Template >>> doesn't >>> exists any more (if I'm not mistaken). >>> >>> >> > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
