It's not for the one person who does a view source. It's for me if I'm trying to figure out what my freakin' source looks like to a browser. Yes, Haml is great for forming well-behaved XHTML. But ultimately, I have to read over what's going to be shipped to the those browsers. So the readability is for me, not the curious bozo who looks at the source.
Just my $.02 On Jul 24, 2007, at 1:35 AM, Mislav Marohnić wrote: > On 7/24/07, Nathan Weizenbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We thought about that, but we wanted to emphasize that it would > involve > sacrificing prettiness more than we wanted to emphasize that it gave > speed increases. > > I don't really see the rationale of wasting bandwidth to send a ton > of whitespace to 999 users just because of the 1 person who is > going to view my source. I know that beautiful output is a feature > of Haml that authors are proud of, bit I'm using Haml because it > makes layout nicer to me (the developer) and allows me to build > them faster. > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
