On 7/24/07, Nathan Weizenbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > We thought about that, but we wanted to emphasize that it would involve > sacrificing prettiness more than we wanted to emphasize that it gave > speed increases.
I don't really see the rationale of wasting bandwidth to send a ton of whitespace to 999 users just because of the 1 person who is going to view my source. I know that beautiful output is a feature of Haml that authors are proud of, bit I'm using Haml because it makes layout nicer to me (the developer) and allows me to build them faster. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
