Awesome idea... my only question: what's the performance hit like? Does bringing the extra context along hurt much?
-Nate On Mar 4, 7:24 pm, Nex3 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey folks, > > When Haml was originally created, Hampton decided to make it even > easier to create divs than it was to create other sorts of tags by > making divs the default. > > Mislav Marohnić had an interesting idea for extending this. In some > cases, divs are invalid - within a p tag, for example, or an ol. What > if instead of producing a div, an implicit tag would create whatever > makes sense? A span, an li, maybe a tr or td. > > There are a few potential issues with this. It makes Haml's output > more dependent on the document context than it usually is, and might > break a few templates. On the other hand, you should be thinking about > the context in which you use divs anyway, and any templates it breaks > are invalid anyway. > > So I wanted to get the community's opinion on this. Is this something > you'd like? Something you'd dislike? Or does it not really matter to > you? > > If you want to try it out, grab Mislav's Haml fork at > git://github.com/mislav/haml.git. > > - Nathan --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
