Well, For paranoia's sake, mostly. I suspect (although it may be unfounded) that it might be valuable when generating XML and not HTML.
Sean Mislav Marohnic' wrote: > Thank you all for your comments. > > On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 8:55 PM, Sean Cribbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > > As far as whether it should have implicit tags, I think it could be a > good thing (time saver), but you should also be able to turn it off. > > > I'm curios, what would you gain by turning this off -- except the > ability to render invalid (X)HTML? > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
