I'm pretty sure from the pastie code snippet this is how it works, but
just to be sure:
%ul
.a yo
.b sup
would compile to:
<ul>
<li class='a'>yo</li>
<div class='b'>sup</div>
</ul>
That is, the implicit tag inside of a 'li' would be a 'div'? This
kind of nested implicit tag might take a little longer for your brain
to process while reading the code, but who knows, maybe it will become
second nature and you'll start to think about the document structure
more instead of relying on explicit tags. And of course, you can
always be explicit if you want to :)
I think it looks very cool and look forward to trying it out.
Mike
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Haml" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
