On 14 Apr 2008, at 15:30, Nathan Weizenbaum wrote:
> No, no, I mean that attributes will always match one of two regexps
> that
> mixins won't (specifically, Sass::ATTRIBUTE and
> Sass::ATTRIBUTE_ALTERNATE_MATCHER). This is the same way we
> distinguish
> attributes from plain old rules.
Ah, my mistake. I see what you're getting at now.
> I mostly just like the symmetry between + and - :-p.
Me too. Must have been why I chose it, though I can't remember the
logic now.
Ok, I'm convinced. I'll have a go at the method you're suggesting. I
still think just choosing another char would be clearer, perhaps the
'=' sign would be more to your liking. Then it's more like a variable
assignment:
=mixin
attribute: value
.selector
+mixin
Does that not tempt?? ;)
I've been busy using the new code and have also generated a patch that
makes mixins work with includes, like constants do, which is super
useful. I suppose I should keep the two separate, for clarity's sake.
g
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Haml" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
